OLOKOTO

THE POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE OF

“OLOKOTO: SONGS OF CHIMA”

Olokoto Goodwill Message | Acknowledgement | Patron's Statement

Curator's Statement | Essays: Songs of Chima List of Artists

 

 

Nkiru Uwechia Nzegwu
 

 

 

Historical Excursions

Seasons of Decay

The Power of Art

Parting Words

Notes and References

 

What does “Olokoto: Songs of Chima” mean?

 

'Olokoto' means plentitude, abundance and fullness. In addition to these primary meanings, the word represents ideas that suggest luxuriance and bounteousness. 'Olokoto' connotes abundance of riches, wealth, and rich harvest. To describe any year as olokoto is to inform a listener or a reader that it was a year of bountiful harvest. The idea of abundance describes not only agricultural produce, but the wealth generated by people as well. As this  exhibition makes clear, this wealth could include works of art some of which are on display as well as the artists who produced them, and who are part of the community's highly trained human capital. The expression “songs of Chima” directs our attention both to the nature of the art object under consideration and to the specific people and community that olokoto is used to characterize. “Songs” metaphorically stand for creative products, works of imagination, and individualized artistic expressions that are perceived as harmonious. “Chima” refers to indigenes of Onitsha who trace the founding of their city to Eze Chima.

 

The exhibition, Olokoto Songs of Chima, is a celebration of the abundance and luxuriant riches that belongs to Onitsha. In a certain sense, it is a clarion call to both friends and foes to take stock of all that the city has achieved both in the arts and in its human resources. Reflection on the riches of the city is necessary given the contemporary condition of Onitsha, today. The city is marked by a catalogue of ills: garbage-strewn streets, unsanitary clogged and overflowing drains, squalid high rises, filthy premises, violent crimes, armed robberies and killings, inhospitable living conditions, lack of city planning, lack of solid waste management, impassable roads, and most important of all total breakdown of law and order. 

 

Transforming and gentrifying the city of Onitsha would require enormous effort. Seeing the city as a place with impressive human and material wealth is crucial since such a perspective provides the critical lens from which to envision plans for transformation. Thus, while this art exhibition purports to be about beauty, aesthetics and art appreciation, it also has a very powerful underlying message. It speaks simultaneously about the plentitude of artistic resources in Onitsha, and it calls on indigenes and residents to renew their pride in this city and to spearhead its physical and moral transformation. In short, in calling for the renaissance of Onitsha, Olokoto Songs of Chima is issuing a call for the urban renewal of the city.

 

Historical Excursions

What hope is there that rejuvenation can occur in Onitsha in a manner that propels it to attain its former glory? Perhaps, we a witnessing the final decline of the city as indigenes once understood it to be? Perhaps, Onitsha would eventually loose its commercial status as its neighbors have been plotting for decades, and would subsequently decline to become a tenth rate urban space?

 

Reviewing the history of Onitsha might ser ve to restore people's faith that the present malaise permeating the city is transient, and like others before it, it too would be overcome.

 

Like all major commercial cities the world over the fortunes of Onitsha has waxed and waned over time. Cities that were able to pull themselves from the brink of poverty and decay did so by rethinking, and in cases reinventing themselves in new unforeseen ways. Amsterdam (Netherlands), Berlin (Germany), Prague (Czechoslovakia) come to mind. A contemporary Third World example is Bangalore in India, which imagined itself as a Silicon Valley tenaciously worked to reinvent itself into a booming hi-tech region. 

 

Historical records show that the fortune of Onitsha had waxed and waned depending on the nation, or group that had a dominant presence on the River Niger - Igala army under Onojo Oboni, Aboh, the trading factors and missionaries, Sir George Goldie of the Royal Niger Company, and from 1914 the British colonial administration upon the amalgamation of southern and northern Nigeria.

 

The second half of the nineteenth century was the Age of Anxiety for Niger Ibos (Elizabeth Isichei 1973, 101) similar in many ways to the uncertainties that exist in these current times. Prior to the beginning of oil palm trade, it was the final decades of the slave trade in which regional peace and security and the normalcy of people's lives were radically disrupted. By 1857, the coming of the Christian Missionary Society (CMS), Onitsha was in a vulnerable position under the reign of Obi Akazua. It was surrounded by enemies Ogidi, 1 Obosi and Aboh.” When Bishop Ajayi Crowder visited Onitsha in 1857, he reported that the town was in a war with 2 Ogidi. According to Kenneth Onwuka Dike, Crowther's description portrayed Onitsha as a prosperous town according to the standards of the day. There were extensive corn and yam plantations, cotton was extensively cultivated, and the people of Onitsha manufactured their own clothes 3 (Kenneth Onwuka Dike 11).

 

By 1868, however, internal misfortunes and the pressure of external threats resulted in the contraction of Onitsha as the residents of the southeastern suburb (Odoje village cluster) deserted their homes and moved into Onitsha core (Crowther 1868:81 cited in Henderson 1972, 101).

 

In spite of all these negative developments, Onitsha was able to pull itself from the brink of decline by making important strategic decisions that placed it on the path of prosperity. In 1857, it welcomed CMS missionaries into the town and signed treaties with European trading missions. By virtue of this decision, it laid the foundation of its future prosperity and ascendancy over all challengers to its status. The decision allowed Onitsha to obtain a steady supply of arms with which to defend itself, and thereby escape its formerly dangerous diplomatic isolation. In addition, the educational head start its inhabitants received, proved invaluable to its rising fortunes. Onitsha's rapid rise to affluence in a few years justified the wisdom of the community in doing business with the Europeans.

 

Just as prosperity settled in, and the people began to speak of the enu Oyibo (the era of the Europeans) and the Age of Olokoto (prosperity), Onitsha faced another monumental challenge that threatened its very sur vival. The new relationship with Europeans was proving difficult as Onitsha people realized that the terms of trade with the factories treated them unfairly. Relationship deteriorated and in response to European traders' request in 1879, Acting Consul Easton, bombarded Onitsha from a gunboat razing the waterside and sacking the Inland Town (Isichei 1973, 110). The object of the attack was to coerce the nation of Onitsha, and through it teach a lesson to other malcontents (Isichei 1973, 109). The state of siege begun by Easton was maintained by the United African Company (UAC), which manned the blockade and continued making unofficial attacks until the end of the reign of the Royal Niger Company (Isichei 1973, 110).

 

Onitsha survived this period of occupation “to have a great future as a market center” (Ibid). It is a credit to the resilience of the city that unlike other Nigerian towns and cities that endured a similar fate, it came back from extinction to become again a formidable powerhouse in shaping the fortune and destiny of Eastern Nigeria. The point here is that the city survived numerous trials and tribulations, and still came back to prominence when many had written it off. There is hope it could accomplish the same feat today.

 

Seasons of Decay:

Twenty-three years after the sack of Onitsha, E. A. Warner described it in 1895: as “a particularly pretty town [with] beautiful trees far larger than one sees in England and often covered with luxuriant creepers. Bamboos, plantains, bananas, and palms of various kinds abound. …The whole town is very clean, the open sandy spaces are kept well swept and the red mud floors of the houses are frequently 4 polished” (E. A. Warner, 1895, 15-16). The unintended benefit of Warner's account is that it offers a powerful argument of the speed in which homegrown rebuilding and transformations can occur. However, his description raises the following questions: how did we get from his account of a clean 1895 Onitsha to the filthy, garbagestrewn city that Onitsha has become? How can the city be so rich in human capital yet so mismanaged and impoverished? How can it have a wealth of intellectuals, people in top managerial positions in multinational corporations and yet be a rubbish heap? Pertinent as these questions are, they may be slightly misplaced in that they divert attention from the crucial point at stake. Emphasis should be on what we can learn from history to address our present predicament, not in underscoring our impotence and of how we failed.

 

From the end of the Biafran War in 1970, phenomenal transformations have occurred in Onitsha both at the level of infrastructure (roads, industries, and buildings) and in the building of the city's social capital (the development of people's potential). The rapid pace of growth has brought about a lowering of people's moral scheme as the old moral order and its related political structures gave way to new political structures and new moral schemes. Crime, corruption, mismanagement of public funds, robbery and cheating have become the part of the normative order of post-Biafran life. The nature of societal that occurred in this period change has been exacerbated at the local level by the grand economic restructuring ongoing at the global level. At the intermediate level of nation states, these economic changes have unleashed a season of poverty and decay on Nigeria and numerous other African countries.

 

The conditionalities these countries accepted in negotiations with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) have proved destructive. The situation in Nigeria is particularly irksome because those at the helm of power continue to use their leadership positions to derail the country's prospects of economic growth. They did this by turning the nation's Central Bank into their piggy banks and by expropriating the country's wealth.

 

In the last four years, in particular, the attack on Onitsha and the well being of the community has come from the Anambra State House in Awka. With the breakdown of the rule of law and of law and order, the moral restraints on people correspondingly broke down as a segments of Onitsha residents and indigenes engaged in all kinds of nefarious practices - armed robbery, killings, swindling that eroded the moral fiber of the community.

 

The question we now face is, how do we regain our moral compass and undertake the rebuilding of they city?.

 

As history reveals, possibilities for change exist. The sur vival of Onitsha depends on the strategic decisions that we make now for the development and growth of the city. These decisions must come from imagining and subsequently reinventing the city into the clean bustling city it once was. But men alone must not do this planning as has been the case in the past seven decades, when men arrogated to themselves the exclusive right to make decisions for the community. In those decades, a male dominant way of doing things was fallaciously justified on the basis of tradition. Yet, historical evidence does show that as far back as 1857 and 1872 the Omu and Ikporo Onitsha were critical participants in the determination of matters of national 5 importance. It was only with the advent of colonialism and its male-privileging ideology, that Onitsha men gained educational advantage. Since then, they have used their advantage in gender discriminatory ways to advance their own cross-cutting interests. This state of affairs has exacted a heavy toll on welfare of Onitsha women. It has shut them out from spaces in which the definitions of the future of Onitsha take place. We should note that this male-privileging way of doing business has allowed deep-seated rot to enter into the psyche of the community. There is no question that Onitsha has become reactionary, oppressive male privileging society that is intent on eradicating all vestiges of its female principle and matrifocal consciousness that once provided the strength of the community.

 

Against this background of male-privileging ideology, it is not surprising that only one woman artist is participating in this exhibition even though numerous Onitsha women are trained artists. The issue should not be “But there are no women artists?” The question should be, what is militating against their practicing of their craft? Future deliberations about the new model of Onitsha must replace retrograde sexist ideas and questions with a generative view of life that affirms Onitsha women.

 

The Power of Art

It makes sense to ask, why is it that artists rather than economic planners or development theorists are initiating this dialogue?

The simple answer is that artists are visionaries. The late internationally renowned artist Ben Enwonwu contends that it is “[t]hrough his or her work the artist warns against what can 6 disturb or destroy the interest of the community and society.”

 

Evidently, the day-to-day matters of earning a living tend to distract people who then become afflicted by existential blindness. Artists provide the way out of this blindness because the artistic process is a process of apprehension and metamorphosis. It is a process of grasping and translating forms of thought and awareness into reality, forcing audiences to think about and contend with new issues. Enwonwu provides a model of this during his Negritude phase when “art is tied up with…political motivations...phrased in political terms.

 

He states that to free [one] self from the ties of foreign domination. . . . Negritude meant...the revitalization of African force, both in art and in all forms of creativity.” He demonstrates negritude by “painting with definite aims in mind and…visions [that] were…characteristic of Black expression” (personal 7 communication 1989).

 

Although publicly Enwonwu appears “wedded” to the Western view of art, one needs to pierce the facade to get at the meaning of his cryptic comments about art, and to see that his works are about things he hardly discusses. Installed on the façade of the Nigerian Museum, Anyanwu has incorrectly been translated as The Awakening, created as it was just before the independence of Ghana and Nigeria. Many interpreters have correctly hypothesized that it is a prophetic prognostication of the impeding wave of independence that swept the continent in the decade of the 1960s. However, there is a missing metaphysical dimension that explains the relationship of the 8 sculpture, Anyanwu, to the divine force, Anyanwu.

 

In everyday colloquial terms the word 'anyanwu' refers to the sun. In standard lexicon, the word is made up of two conjuncts 'anya' (eye) and 'anwu' light. This literal translation “the eye of light” construes the sun as the eye of light. The questions this raises are, Whose eye is the sun? And to whom does it belong?

 

The logical direction of these questions alerts us a) that more is being asked than can be answered by our everyday framework; and b) that the meaning of the standard lexicon must derive its intelligibility from elsewhere.

 

In After God is Dibia, John Anenechukwu Umeh discusses how the everyday meaning of 'anyanwu' (the sun) is parasitic on the 9 underlying esoteric framework of Igbo metaphysics (1997). On this framework, 'anya Anwu' is the “Eye of the Lord or Divinity of Light,” which is also the Supreme Force or Chu Ukwu (the great Being/God) of anwu or light. Umeh describes Anwu (Light) as another name for Agwu, the Holy Spirit that is a part of Chi Ukwu. According to him, “[a]s Ose Obala, Agwu is God of Light (Anwu) whose Eye is the Sun (Anyanwu). At times Agwu is also regarded as Anyanwu, the Sun God” (114). On this metaphysical scheme Agwu, the Holy Spirit, is a female force “Nne Nwanyi (the Old Lady of God, i.e., the Divine Lady Mother Spirit.)” (111) as well as the Supreme Force of eternity and the ruler of everlastingness (ibid).

 

When this information is brought to bear on Enwonwu's sculpture, Anyanwu, we find the artist speaking in two modes: at the superficial level for the public and at the deeper esoteric level, for those who understand the symbolism and forms of esoteric language. While the public level dwells on history and political transformation, the esoteric level addresses some truths about the structure of reality. The series of paintings and sculptures on this theme function as divine truths. The sculpture, Anyanwu, correctly identifies as female the divinity Anyanwu, the “Spirit of Light and of the Rising Sun,” who is both Agwu and the Divine Old Lady of God.

 

Enwonwu's is clear about the esoteric meaning of his work as his following comment reveals. He described his sculpture, Anyanwu, as the “genetic forces embodied in womanhood…flowering into the fullest stature of a nation, a 10 people.” This description both recognizes the female character of his work, and of Anyanwu the Divinity. Through his work, Enwonwu is telling us that emanation of the God of Light are embodied in women. The sculpture, Anyanwu, not only marks the “compelling idea of the spirit to be found in 11 Africa” it proclaims the centrality of women in the regeneration of the future Africa. He seems to be suggesting that the dynamism of life, of wisdom and of truth do not totally reside in men, as most nationalist male activists and postcolonial African males assume. For him, a significant dimension of the future of Africa rests on women because of the presence of this God of Light residing in women folk.

 

In a compelling way, Enwonwu's sculpture resists and undercuts the current fashionable attempt to reconstruct societies in Africa as traditionally male dominant and patriarchal. It is for this reason that his work asserts that there is little historical validity to this masculinist view as well as to the constructed histories being peddled by those with limited knowledge of Igbo conceptual scheme. Anyanwu asserts in deep metaphysical language that bringing women into the political process augurs well for the future of the continent. Recognition of the mystical basis of his forms and of the visionary character of his creativity establishes Enwonwu's linkage to an older artistic universe in which the search for deeper spiritual fulfillment is of paramount concern.

 

For him, the concept of art for art's sake is hardly an intelligible option for political actors, which is what every social being in a society is. In fact, for him to opt for a nonpolitical position is really to make a political choice, one that is steeped in irresponsibility, because it amounts to an abdication of one's social and political rights.

 

Parting Words:

It is fitting to end this essay with Enwonwu's evaluation of the works of younger artists, if only to raise the metric bar and critically engage the artists who are participating in this exhibition. Reflecting on the state of art two years before he died, Enwonwu stated: Recent contemporary Nigerian art of today is largely experimental. My general impression is that it is based more on techniques than true lasting values. It will survive only if it expresses the aspirations of African people, which in essence is their yearnings for a better way of life. It must represent the intrinsic value and the significance of life that is at the core of our political and social being.

 

The younger generation of artists are wonderful, wonderful explorers. Their use of techniques is superb. They are not copying traditional forms which is a very good thing. But they have not established a period, a definite period of artistic evolution. They have not, as we did in our time, come up with something very definite to say. Most of [the woks] do not have inspiration even though they are technically strong. Unlike our art, which was born in trying times, from the experiences of colonialism, the nature of the experiences drove us to use art as an instrument of power and freedom. The tragedy is that young Nigerian artists are enjoying the fruits of Western techniques without saying something strong in their art. And it is not true that there is nothing for them to say. Yes, in our time, we talked about independence and African personality and dignity. But in these contemporary times, there is a lot happening to Africa and Africans that should appropriately be the subject of their works.

 

But they are not saying anything about them. Some of them are, but not as many as one would hope.

 

There is a vacuum. There are techniques, but it is not sufficiently anchored to the aspirations of people in Africa. If African art is to evolve these issues must be addressed. The younger generation of artists must realize the power of images, and what it can achieve within a political context. (Interview with the author in 1992) In concluding, Olokoto: Songs of Chima is much more than a mindless displaying of objects and colored canvases. At a serious level, it calls on Onitsha Ado indigenes and residents to reflect on the material, intellectual, and spiritual richness of their community. Although, very much unacknowledged, these riches are the vital resources that must become the engine of social transformation. As citizens, we must imagine a better future for Onitsha and deploy enabling myths to pull us out of the morass of decay.

 

Notes and References

  1. Elizabeth Isichei, The Ibo People and the Europeans (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1973), 101. Note that the Onitsha/Ogidi war was in 1857.

  2. According to Crowther and Taylor, “a good many houses were deserted at the east end of the town, where a constant look-out was kept for the approach of the enemies, and the inhabitants have removed to the west parts, which are safer (1859: 32 cited in Richard Henderson 1972, 101).” Richard Henderson The King in Every Man (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972).

  3. Kenneth Onwuka Dike, Origins of the Niger Mission 1814-1891 (Ibadan: Ibadan University Press, 1962).

  4. Reproduced in Elizabeth Isichei, Igbo Worlds: An Anthology of Oral Histories and Historical Descriptions (Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1978), 263.

  5. See the account of John Witford “An Audience with Obi Akazua (d.1872). Reproduced in The Onitsha Kingdom in the Elizabeth Isichei, Igbo Worlds: An Anthology of Oral Histories and Historical Descriptions (Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues, 1978), 256-259.

  6. Ben Ewonwu “Problems of the African Artist Today,”Présence Africaine, vol. 8-10 (June-November 1956): 177-78.

  7. For an extended treatment of this issue see Nkiru Nzegwu, “Representational Axis: Cultural Realignment of Enwonwu,” Contemporary Textures: Multidimensionality in Nigerian Art (Binghamton: ISSA, 1999), 139-185.

  8. This analysis is fully developed in “Contemporizing Nka: Mind, Medium and Spirit in the Creative Process,” a chapter devoted to Enwonwu in a book length manuscript in progress on Nigeria's modernity in the arts.

  9. John Anenechukwu Umeh, After God is Dibia, vol 1 (London: Karnak  House, 1997). The insight for most of this section on shrines, spiritual energy, and ndi dibia have come from years of marriage and association with those who are either knowledgeable in this area, or are dibia.

  10. West African Review (London), no. 28, (352) 1957, p.6.

  11. Drum (East Africa), May 1958, p. 37.

 

Back to Top